If you're a sports fan, you've undoubtedly heard that the Mets fired their manager Willie Randolph along with a couple of their coaches. This event has been a long time coming, and rumors have been circulating in the news for a while now. Evidently, when the team's payroll is in excess of $130 million, people tend to expect the team to actually win a majority of is games. Fans have even been chanting for management to fire Randolph after repeated disappointing series. What's surprising me is that there's an awful lot of criticism surrounding the decision today. I'm not going to detail everything that went down - for that, you can check out ESPN.com or some similar site. Personally, I'm happy it happened. I've got nothing against Willie Randolph. He was a darn good player in his day, he had plenty of success as a coach on the Yankees around the turn of the century, and I'm sure he'll be a heck of a manager on another team. But his mild-mannered approach just doesn't cut it. I don't think that kind of personality often works on a big market team with big market salaries and big market egos. The Mets have gone that route before and have done even worse. Unfortunately, I remember the Art Howe era and the Dallas Green era all too well.
But their greatest historical successes have come with a manager that has a true passion for the game that they wear on their sleeve. The Mets of the mid- to late-90's were managed by Davey Johnson, a no-nonsense kind of guy that didn't hesitate getting right in your face. He guided the team to the 1986 World Series championship and the 1988 NL East title, not to mention the team record for wins in a season. The Mets of the late 90's and early 00's were managed by a guy named Bobby Valentine. Valentine was certainly a "unique" individual, and his approach to the game certainly ruffled a few feathers. But no one could ever doubt the excitement he had for the game, and he would go to any length to make sure his team win. Heck, how many other managers would sneak back into the dugout after getting ejected from the game, sporting a set of sunglasses and a moustache to conceal his identity? I think Randolph can be a successful manager in a smaller market. Which is not to say he has to be on a bad team. Check the standings today and you'll see that there are plenty of small-market teams having big success this year (Tampa Bay, Florida, and Arizona come to mind). I've been checking out plenty of articles about the current Mets situation and their handling of the coaching dismissals. Suddenly, it seems that all of those "Fire Willie" chants have been replaced by people crying that the process was unfair for Willie. Some people are even going so far as to say that they are embarrassed to be a Mets fan. Well, I'll never say that and I think that a true fan would never let those words come out of his/her mouth. What does bother me, though, are the "facts" that are used to claim that Randolph was fired unfairly.
For example, its been often repeated today that Randolph was fired at 3 am, and it would be pretty mean to fire someone at 3 am. That time alone conjures up images of the phone ringing while someone's asleep (and I'm not implying any Hillary Clinton references here). The truth of the matter is that it was 3 am eastern time. The team, and the general manager that did the firing, were all in Los Angeles for a series against the Angels. That would make it around midnight. Given that the game didn't end until around 10:30 or so Pacific time, and this was immediately followed by the post-game press conference, midnight doesn't seem quite so outrageous anymore. There are a few things that are questionable, and I'll admit that they should have just fired him a day or two earlier when he was still in New York. But that 3 am thing is ridiculous and just plain wrong. It was late afternoon in Australia at the time. Is that a more acceptable time for a firing?
Many people also complain that it wasn't Randolph's fault for the team's lack of success. The argument is that the blame should fall on the players and on this topic, I somewhat agree. The players are underperforming and many of them are just old and past their prime. But I think that the job of the manager is to do more than fill out a scorecard at the beginning of a game. Its a large part of the manager's job to get the most of his players and motivate them. It may be a bit unfair, but major league baseball is a business. When teams don't play to the level of expectations, someone's got to take the fall and historically its been the manager. This is nothing new. Its happened many, many times before and it will continue to happen many, many times in the future. When the owners put up $130 million for the team, a sub-.500 record just isn't going to cut it. This is a team that was put together to win now. There's no "rebuilding". Most of the current players are over 30, and their farm system is rather depleted after some off-season trades.
Finally, I was convinced that this was for the best when Randolph was quoted as saying that he was "stunned and surprised" that he was let go. REALLY? Could he really be either stunned or surprised? Did he think he was doing the job for which he was hired? Wasn't the fact that the media has been talking about this for weeks a bit of a clue? How about the nearly 50,000 people at Shea Stadium chanting "Fire Willie"? Either he's full of crap, or he's out of touch with the team and what's expected of him. Either way, its time for him to go.
I realize that the tone of this posting isn't exactly positive. Those that know me know that I'm a rather passionate Mets fan, and this is an issue that's been bothering me all day. Sometimes blog posting can be a bit therapeutic. I think that the Mets needed a change. Whether or not they have the best person at the helm remains to be seen (I don't think they do), but nonetheless a change was needed. I hope for the best for Randolph in his future endeavors because I think he's a good guy and one of the smarter guys in the game. But it just wasn't working on the Mets. Heck, he's in Los Angeles now. Perhaps his old boss Joe Torre can give him a job on the Dodgers?



